BACKIdea and Emptiness:Youth in the Post-Ideological Age--An Interpretation of He Sen’s Works | Zhu Qi
From 1998 He Sen’s paintings began to deal with themes of youth and growing up, themes that bore
some relation to the spiritual state of Chinese youth in the late 1990s. The works he produced just
before and after 1998 typically depict fashionable young people sitting in empty rooms, dimly lit
and furnished only with a sofa. Facing the camera, these stylish boys and girls are momentarily terror
stricken, faces blurred featureless by a flash of white light as they lean forward, not knowing what to
do with themselves. He Sen’s painting expressed the empty feeling of a new generation.
In the late 1990s, He Sen was one of a number of young painters who started to use the ideas of
photography to express an individual and personal psychological reality. The visual content of their
works focussed on themes related to youth, reflecting their inner predicaments in an allegorical way.
And so the phenomenon of ‘Cruel Youth’ painting appeared.
He Sen describes the inner state of a generation of young people during a period of transformation
in Chinese society; however, he gives no hint of the social influences that lie in the background,
but expresses the spiritual sickness of this generation through allegorical images. He Sen’s young
people are fashionably dressed and physically attractive, but they are sitting in an atmosphere of dark
depression and monotonous boredom. There is a sense not only of lethargy but also of emptiness.
They seem a bit innocent, also slightly decadent, and although intelligent they apparently have
no enthusiasm for anything, no utopian fantasises. They seem to bear no hatred for anything, but
neither do they love anything, there is nothing that can arouse their emotions and impulses. They
sit in completely empty rooms, feeling that sort of nihilism that is peculiar to youth, an emptiness
devoid of any illusions other than youth itself and material ideals. What He Sen’s canvases convey
is a sad mood and an anxiety linked to the period in which this new generation grew up, a time
when globalisation and capitalism entered China, when Chinese society started to be influenced by
materialism and commercial culture and began to display post-ideological cultural qualities.
In their approach to painting, He Sen’s generation of painters began to explore a relationship between
painting and photography, an exploration similar to German painter Gerhard Richter’s imitation of
photographic images. Visually, He Sen’s paintings are for the most part a depiction of a certain level
of ideas relating to photography; the idea is not to portray an external social reality, but to reflect the
escapist feelings present in the hearts of this generation through allegorical photograph style images.
On these two levels, the idea of photography and the idea of allegory, He Sen has found a visual
continuity, which is that the ideas of photography can be turned into painted images. It is a fabricated
photographic visual style, designed to express a kind of fabricated reality. This method is really a kind
of psychological realism that uses psychologically realistic images to convey the new ego subjectivity
experienced during the late 90s by the generation born around 1970. So He Sen’s paintings could be
said to be a form of psychoanalysis through painting.
Looking at He Sen’s recent works, we can see that his style is becoming slightly more expressionistic;
this can be seen in the backgrounds, large expanses of warm red or cool blue, and also in the
sexy details of the female body; these aspects intensify a hedonistic quality that typifies the post–
ideological age. Visually, these works are no longer an imitation of photography. He Sen has started
to lay special emphasis on the depiction of realistic facial details, psychoanalysing his female subjects.
In his new works, the idea of the female body mainly serves the idea of psychoanalysis through
painting; it is not a dissection of the reality of the female body, but an allegoric collective symbol. He
Sen uses some of the physical and emotional characteristics of the alternative young women of this
age, in order to convey the pessimism and nihilism of a whole generation growing up in the era of
globalism.
In a certain sense, through his painting He Sen tries to express the idea of the self-construction of the
younger generation in the late 90s. For this generation, who were born in the late 60s or early 70s, the
idea of self is mixed up and contradictory, a combination of youthful melancholy, post-ideological
nihilism, hedonism and consumer materialism.
Several of these new works show young men or women cuddling soft toys, caught between the sense
of safety given by the toy and the sense of terror that accompanies growing up. But these are merely
visual clues that He Sen uses to lead the viewer into the world of meaning that he wants to create.
The world that can be entered by following this path is in actual fact the predicament of youth, or to
put it another way, the crisis of self experienced by the new generation, brought about by nihilistic
psychology and bearing the marks of globalism.
In He Sen’s paintings, this predicament is neither criticised nor condemned, and this in itself is where
He Sen shows his post–ideological mentality, because he is a member of this new generation, unable
to find a definite critical standard amid this period of social transformation. Under these conditions,
painting as He Sen practises it serves more as an aesthetic form of self-redemption, something that
can open up an aesthetic window through which to overcome and escape the emptiness of youth. In
a certain sense, using painting as a form of individual escapism seems to be the sole doctrine followed
by the art of this period.